A DV360 audit should check much more than whether CPM, CTR or CPA looks good.
Before optimizing a campaign, you need to know whether the account structure, tracking, budgets, bidding, audiences, inventory, frequency, creative, deals and reporting are configured correctly.
Otherwise, you risk optimizing around a setup problem.
The purpose of a DV360 audit is to separate configuration issues from genuine performance issues before budget is moved or targeting is changed.
Quick answer: A complete DV360 audit should validate campaign hierarchy, Floodlight and conversion tracking, budgets and pacing, bidding, targeting, inventory, brand suitability, frequency, creative, CTV/video setup, deals, attribution and reporting. Only after those areas are verified should performance optimization begin.
Download the Complete DV360 Audit Checklist
Use our 86-point DV360 Audit Checklist to review an account before launch, during an optimization cycle, when performance declines or when taking over an existing DV360 account.
The checklist covers:
Account and campaign structure
Floodlight and conversion tracking
Budget and pacing
Bidding
Audiences
Geography and devices
Inventory
Brand suitability
Frequency
Creative
Video and CTV
Deals and PMPs
Reporting and attribution
Download the DV360 Audit Checklist
What should a DV360 audit cover?
A useful audit answers three questions:
Is the campaign configured correctly?
Is the campaign receiving enough eligible inventory and data to perform?
Are performance problems caused by strategy, execution or measurement?
Those questions should be answered in that order.
If tracking is broken, CPA is unreliable.
If targeting is too restrictive, increasing bids may not solve delivery.
If frequency caps are too aggressive, the campaign may appear to have an inventory problem.
If a deal is not properly targeted, premium supply may never become eligible.
A good audit therefore begins with technical validation, not optimization.
1. Audit the account and campaign structure
Start at the top of the DV360 hierarchy:
Partner → Advertiser → Campaign → Insertion Order → Line Item → Creative
The audit should confirm that the structure reflects the actual media strategy.
Check:
Is the correct advertiser being used?
Are users assigned the correct permissions?
Are campaigns separated logically?
Are insertion orders grouped by objective, channel or budget?
Are line items separated enough to optimize independently?
Are naming conventions consistent?
Are dates aligned across campaign, IO and line-item levels?
Poor hierarchy makes optimization and reporting harder even when the campaign technically delivers.
For setup guidance, see our step-by-step DV360 campaign setup guide.
2. Audit Floodlight and conversion tracking
Do not evaluate campaign performance until measurement is verified.
Audit:
Which Floodlight activities are used?
Are they the correct business actions?
Are conversion windows appropriate?
Are duplicate activities inflating results?
Are post-view and post-click conversions being interpreted correctly?
Is attribution consistent with reporting elsewhere?
Are conversion values being passed correctly where relevant?
If DV360 and another analytics platform show different conversion numbers, that does not automatically mean one is broken.
Different platforms can use different attribution methods and conversion logic.
The audit should document those differences before judging performance.
3. Audit budgets and pacing
Budget problems are often mistaken for targeting or inventory problems.
Review:
Total budget
Daily pacing
Start and end dates
Spend to date
Remaining budget
Planned vs actual pacing
Then check each line item.
Questions to ask:
Are some line items consuming too much budget?
Are stronger line items being restricted?
Is the IO budget preventing line-item delivery?
Is pacing too aggressive early in the campaign?
Is spend being distributed according to strategy rather than simply availability?
A campaign can hit its total budget and still have poor allocation.
4. Audit the bidding strategy
The bid strategy should match the objective and the amount of data available.
Review:
Bid strategy
Bid amount
Optimization objective
Conversion volume
Learning period
Bid limits
Historical CPM or CPA
Whether the strategy was changed too frequently
An algorithm cannot optimize effectively if the campaign repeatedly changes direction.
Before switching bidding models, confirm that the existing strategy has enough volume and time to learn.
5. Audit audience targeting
Targeting is one of the first places to check when delivery is weak.
Review:
First-party audiences
Customer Match
Remarketing
Google audiences
Publisher audiences
Third-party data where available
Optimized targeting
Audience exclusions
Then check how audiences interact with other targeting layers.
A line item targeting:
small audience + narrow geography + specific device + one deal + tight frequency
may simply have too little eligible inventory.
The question is not only:
“Is this audience relevant?”
It is also:
“Is this audience large enough to deliver under the rest of the campaign settings?”
6. Audit geography and device targeting
Check that geographic targeting reflects the campaign brief.
Review:
Countries
Regions
Cities
ZIP/postal codes
Proximity targeting
Excluded locations
Device targeting
CTV-specific device settings
Geographic mistakes can be expensive because the campaign may still deliver normally - just in the wrong places.
7. Audit inventory sources
Inventory-source targeting determines which exchanges and private deals can supply impressions.
Audit:
Which exchanges are enabled?
Are inventory sources intentionally included or excluded?
Are deal IDs correctly targeted?
Is public inventory being restricted unnecessarily?
Are inventory filters reducing scale?
Are exclusion lists still relevant?
Is the campaign buying from the expected supply sources?
For campaigns with delivery problems, inventory restrictions should be checked before increasing bids.
8. Audit brand safety and suitability
Review:
Advertiser-level brand suitability
Content categories
Digital content labels
Sensitive-category exclusions
Apps and URL exclusions
Third-party verification
Deal-specific exceptions
The audit should answer:
Are we protecting the brand without unnecessarily removing high-quality eligible inventory?
Brand safety and brand suitability are not identical.
Safety protects against content advertisers should not appear next to.
Suitability determines the additional level of content sensitivity appropriate for a specific advertiser.
9. Audit frequency caps
Frequency should be reviewed at every relevant hierarchy level.
Check:
Campaign frequency
IO frequency
Line-item frequency
Time period
Cross-line-item overlap
Audience size
CTV-specific exposure levels
A frequency cap that looks reasonable at line-item level may become restrictive when combined with an IO or campaign-level cap.
If delivery is weak, frequency is one of the first controls to inspect.
10. Audit creative
Strong targeting cannot rescue unusable or weak creative.
Review:
Creative approval status
Correct dimensions
Destination URLs
Click tracking
Landing-page functionality
Video specifications
Creative rotation
Frequency by creative
Performance by creative
Expired messaging
Creative fatigue
Also confirm that enough creative variation exists to support meaningful testing.
11. Audit video and Connected TV
Video and CTV campaigns require additional checks.
Review:
Device targeting
CTV inventory
Video duration
Completion rate
Publisher mix
Creative compatibility
Inventory environment
Deals
Frequency
Geographic scale
Brand suitability
Every additional targeting layer reduces scale.
A CTV campaign combining a narrow audience, small geography and limited publisher list may underdeliver even with a competitive bid.
12. Audit deals and PMPs
For every deal, confirm:
Deal ID
Publisher
Inventory type
Start and end dates
CPM
Budget
Creative eligibility
Geography
Device
Audience
Frequency
Deal status
Line-item targeting
A negotiated deal does not automatically serve simply because it exists in the account.
Also check whether additional audience, geography or brand-suitability restrictions are removing most eligible impressions.
13. Audit reporting
A good DV360 audit compares:
Spend
Impressions
Reach
Frequency
CPM
Clicks
CTR
Conversions
CPA
Viewability
Video completion
Inventory source
Device
Geography
Audience
Creative
Line item
Deal performance
For a deeper measurement framework, read our DV360 Reporting Metrics That Really Matter.
If your team uses dashboard reporting, see our DV360 to Looker Studio Guide.
14. Audit attribution before optimizing
Conversion reporting can look different depending on:
Attribution model
Conversion window
Post-view logic
Post-click logic
Floodlight configuration
Analytics platform
Before pausing a line item because CPA looks poor, make sure the comparison is valid.
Every audit should document:
Which attribution model are we using to make optimization decisions?
15. Separate configuration problems from performance problems
Every audit finding should be classified.
Category | Example |
|---|---|
Configuration issue | Wrong targeting, broken tracking, missing deal, restrictive frequency |
Delivery issue | Insufficient inventory, low bids, narrow audience |
Performance issue | Campaign delivers normally but CPA, CTR or VCR is weak |
Do not solve a configuration problem with a performance optimization.
For example:
Problem: Campaign underspends.
Possible causes:
Geography too narrow
Audience too small
Deal unavailable
Frequency too restrictive
Inventory excluded
The wrong response is:
Increase the bid immediately.
Diagnose eligibility first.
16. Prioritize audit findings
Not every issue deserves equal attention.
Critical
Problems that make data or delivery unreliable.
Examples:
Broken tracking
Wrong geography
Incorrect budget
Rejected creative
Missing deal targeting
High
Problems that materially limit performance.
Examples:
Overly restrictive audience
Poor pacing
Excessive frequency
Wrong bid strategy
Weak inventory mix
Medium
Optimization opportunities.
Examples:
Creative fatigue
Audience reallocations
Device adjustments
Supply-path refinement
Low
Reporting and housekeeping improvements.
Examples:
Naming conventions
Dashboard layout
Historical labels
Archived creative cleanup
Fix Critical issues before evaluating performance.
When should you run a DV360 audit?
Before launch
QA the setup before media begins spending.
48–72 hours after launch
Verify delivery, tracking and inventory.
After the learning period
Evaluate bidding and audience performance.
Before a major budget increase
Make sure scaling will not amplify an existing problem.
When performance declines
Separate technical issues from genuine performance deterioration.
When taking over an account
Audit the inherited structure before changing it.
Before renewing a provider
Use the checklist to evaluate whether campaign operations are being managed properly.
If a campaign is already underperforming and you need deeper diagnosis, read our Display and Video Campaign Underperformance Audit.
The bottom line
A DV360 audit is not a report card.
It is a decision framework.
The goal is to verify that the campaign has:
Reliable measurement
Logical structure
Correct budgets
Appropriate bidding
Enough audience scale
Eligible inventory
Sensible frequency
Approved creative
Working deals
Useful reporting
Only after those elements are validated should optimization begin.
Otherwise, campaign teams can spend time adjusting bids, budgets or audiences when the real problem is structural.
Use the downloadable 86-point DV360 Audit Checklist to create a repeatable QA process across every DV360 account you manage.
For teams that need ongoing campaign execution, optimization and reporting support, read our DV360 Managed Service Guide.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a DV360 audit?
A DV360 audit is a systematic review of an advertiser's campaign structure, tracking, budgets, bidding, targeting, inventory, creative, frequency, deals and reporting.
What should I check first in a DV360 audit?
Start with measurement and campaign configuration. Tracking, budgets, dates, targeting and inventory should be validated before performance metrics are used to make optimization decisions.
How often should DV360 campaigns be audited?
Run QA before launch and shortly after launch, then repeat structured audits at meaningful optimization points, before major budget changes or when performance materially changes.
What is the difference between a DV360 audit and campaign optimization?
An audit identifies whether setup and measurement are reliable. Optimization changes campaign settings to improve results. Optimization should follow validation.
What should I check when DV360 is underspending?
Review geography, audiences, inventory, deals, device targeting, frequency caps, budget settings and bids before assuming the platform simply needs a higher bid.
Should I check Floodlight during every audit?
Yes. Incorrect Floodlight configuration can make campaign performance appear better or worse than it really is.
Can frequency caps cause DV360 underdelivery?
Yes. Frequency controls at campaign, insertion-order and line-item levels can restrict eligible impressions.
How do I audit a DV360 CTV campaign?
Review device and CTV inventory targeting, geography, audience scale, publisher/deal eligibility, creative specifications, frequency, pacing and video completion performance.
Can overly restrictive targeting hurt DV360 performance?
Yes. Combining several narrow targeting conditions can significantly reduce eligible inventory and campaign scale.
Is there a downloadable DV360 audit checklist?
Yes. Download the complete 86-point checklist included in this guide and use it as a repeatable QA framework for DV360 campaigns.









